Drug-eluting stents: cost versus clinical benefit.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The publication in January 2001 of the first-in-man results showing zero restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation produced enormous excitement in the cardiological community.1 The long-awaited tool—a safe, restenosis-proof, easy-to-use stent—had been found. It was not too long thereafter that paclitaxel-eluting stents also demonstrated their capability to decrease restenosis. Today, both sirolimusand paclitaxel-eluting stents have been shown in randomized trials to reduce restenosis as compared with conventional metallic stents (Figure 1).2–6 Most of these studies have been recently released in the form of abstracts during medical meetings and are still unpublished.3,5,6 In addition to sirolimus and paclitaxel, other agents have shown promising early results in recent studies, enlarging the body of evidence demonstrating the potential benefits of what are known as drug-eluting stents.7 Regulatory agencies have been very active in evaluating some of these devices in the United States, Europe, South America, and Asia. The sirolimuseluting stent has been available for routine use in Europe, South America, and Asia since the first half of 2002 and received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to be marketed in April 2003. Paclitaxel-eluting stents have also received CE (Conformité Européenne) marking for commercialization in Europe and are now beginning to be commercialized. The case seemed to be closed. Restenosis, the Achilles’ heel of percutaneous revascularization, appeared defeated. However, since the sirolimus-eluting stents became available, very little has changed in the everyday life of almost all interventional laboratories in Europe. Why? Has the new treatment presented any undesirable effect? Was the desire to defeat restenosis not as great as supposed? The answer is none of the above. The limitation currently impeding more widespread use of the new technology is nontechnical, nonmedical, and nonbiological. The list price of the sirolimus-eluting stent in Europe is €2300 ($2500 US). This high price relative to bare stents, as well as the absence of incremental reimbursement in most countries, has been an obstacle to more widespread utilization of drug-eluting stents.
منابع مشابه
Immunosuppressive therapy and tolerance of organ allografts.
Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1315-23. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:221-31. Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, et al. Late clinical events after ...
متن کامل[Is systematic use of drug-eluting stents justified? Arguments against].
Antiproliferative drug-eluting stents represent a miles tone in advances in interventional cardiology. The amount and quality of the scientific evidence now show these new stents to be highly effective in reducing neointimal proliferation, and hence the process of restenosis. Their clinical impact can be expected to become relevant in terms of both increased indications for angioplasty and the ...
متن کاملDrug-eluting stents.
In their recent systematic review, Suzanne Ligthart and associates compared analyses of the cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents. They found that in most studies in which an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio greater than $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year was calculated the study authors recommended against the widespread use of drug-eluting stents. However, we believe that previous...
متن کاملCost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce the need for repeat target revascularization (TVR) compared with bare metal stents (BMS) but are more costly. The objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DES versus BMS. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated clinical outcomes and costs of care over 3 years in 1147 undergoing BMS before the availability of DES and 1247 DES patients at Wake For...
متن کاملA stent is not just a stent: Stent construction and design do matter in its clinical performance.
The undisputed superiority of stents over conventional balloon angioplasty has resulted in a plethora of stents in clinical use. Recent data, however, have indicated not all stent models are the same. Nuances in stent design and construction have impacted significantly on the immediate and long-term clinical outcome. Among the stainless steel stents, those with multicellular or tubular designs ...
متن کاملDrug eluting stents: maximising benefit and minimising cost.
A policy of selective implantation of drug eluting stents, in a minority of lesions most likely to benefit, seems to be a rational way to employ this new and currently costly technology.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Circulation
دوره 107 24 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003